President Trump’s infamous tweets on trade continue to spark serious disputes between the world’s most influential superpowers as a fickle Federal Reserve (Fed), rising recessionary fears, and the upcoming U.S. presidential election top the list of potential domestic risks. Mix in a global economic slowdown, Brexit uncertainty, Italy’s budget crisis, escalating tensions with Iran, the long-running political crisis in Venezuela, and you have the perfect recipe for a volatile market. While most of these headlines serve as daily noise to give investors both sugar highs (and sugar crashes), investors must be prudent with their investments and remain committed to their long-term financial plans.
With the U.S. economy poised to notch the longest economic expansion in the history of our country in July (121 months), investors can no longer count on tax cuts, quantitative easing, or early-cycle “bounce back” growth to support the market. While risks have risen, the expectation is that the U.S. economy will not slip into recession over the next 12 months.
U.S./China trade tensions have been a hallmark of President Trump’s time in office and a major market overhang that threatens to initiate a decoupling of the world’s largest economies, disrupting supply chains, and potentially hitting company earnings in the process.
Trade angst that leads to less interaction between economies, in most circumstances, leads to lower economic growth as supply chains are interrupted and more alternatives are less cost-efficient. China may no longer be the cheapest country to manufacture many goods, but a sharp slowdown in the country’s exports due to trade-war angst threatens much more than just a reduction in the country’s economic growth level. More trade frictions create further pressures and incentives for Europe to choose a side, or face new tariffs or sanctions from others.
THE ECONOMICS OF TARIFFS
Tariffs raise costs, disrupt supply chains, invite retaliation in the form of increased tariffs against U.S. exports, and dampen business fixed investment. There is growing evidence that tariffs are having a negative impact on U.S. economic growth but, to date, they appear unlikely, by themselves, to push the U.S. economy into a recession. The potential third round of tariffs would have a greater impact. Some Fed officials may fear the inflationary implications of tariffs. However, that impact would be transitory. The bigger concern should be the drag on growth. Hence, the Fed could lower short-term interest rates by the end of the year. Such an outcome is already anticipated in the federal funds futures market, which is pricing in a 100% chance of one or more rate cuts by the end of this year.
The near-term outlook has been mixed, with a healthy consumer sector, but softness in business fixed investment. With the May 10 increase in tariffs on Chinese goods, the drag on U.S. growth has become more noticeable and a further escalation (25% tariffs on the remaining $300 billion or so in Chinese goods) would likely have an impact on the economy. The Federal Reserve (Fed) is poised to lower short-term interest rates, if needed. Risks to the growth outlook are weighted to the downside, but much depends on whether we’ll see a resolution of trade tensions.
See PDF Version Here
View the Full Report
Raymond James. “Economic Snapshot.” Investment Strategy Quarterly. Pg. 5,7,8, Web.
Raymond James, “Investment Strategy Quarterly Recap.” Investment Strategy Quarterly. Pg. 16, Web.
Investing involves risk, and investors may incur a profit or a loss. Past performance is not an indication of future results. There is no assurance that any forecast mentioned will occur. Expressions of opinion are as of this date, subject to change without notice and are not guaranteed to occur. Some material in this newsletter prepared by Raymond James for use its financial advisors. This information is not a complete summary or statement of all available data necessary for making an investment decision and does not constitute a recommendation. All opinions are those of the author and not necessarily Raymond James.
Posted July 30, 2019 in Market Updates News Articles